污染场地土壤修复目标值差异探讨 ——以重庆某化工厂遗留场地为例
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X825

基金项目:


Inconsistency of Soil Remediation Targets Derived from Risk Assessment Model and Environmental Standards: A Case Study of a Chemical Plant in Chongqing, Southwest China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    污染场地土壤修复目标值确定对于土壤污染的修复效果至关重要,也是污染土壤修复工程实践中出现的难点。国家环境保护部已正式发布了《污染场地风险评估技术导则》(HJ25.3—2014),但实际上《土壤环境质量标准》(GB15618—1995)、《展览会用地土壤环境质量评价标准》(HJ350—2007)等土壤环境质量标准仍未修订或废止,导致两种评价方式并行,且两种不同方式确定的修复目标值存在明显差异,为修复工作带来了极大的困难。本文调查了重庆某化工厂遗留场地土壤污染现状,分别通过两种评价方式确定了修复目标值,结果显示,两种评价方法确定的超标最严重污染物均为苯并[a]芘,但风险评估模型计算的和土壤环境质量标准确定的修复目标值存在较大差异,分别为0.041、0.3 mg/kg,计算确定的修复目标值低于现有标准规定的适用限值,建议国家尽快修订或出台与风险评估模型相适应的土壤环境质量标准。

    Abstract:

    Remediation target of contaminated site is crucial to soil remediation project, but remains as a challenge. ‘Technical Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites (HJ25.3—2014)’ was officially issued by Ministry of Ecology and Environment, however, other environmental quality standards for soil amendment are not abolished or still valid, such as the ‘Soil Environmental Quality Standards (GB15618—1995)’ and‘Standard of Soil Quality Assessment for Exhibition Sites (HJ350—2007)’, etc., resulting in confusion and inconsistency in determining the remediation targets, which has triggered lots of problems in soil remediation. In this paper, based on the survey of a chemical plant in Chongqing, remediation targets are determined and compared by risk assessment model and environmental standards, respectively. Results indicated that for both evaluation systems the most dominant soil pollutant was benzo-(a)-pyrene, but the remediation targets varied significantly, which was 0.041mg/kg for risk assessment model and 0.3 mg/kg for environmental quality standards. Therefore, it is urgent tor revise and issue current soil environmental quality standards to match the soil risk assessment models.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

余云飞,杨世辉,严 浩.污染场地土壤修复目标值差异探讨 ——以重庆某化工厂遗留场地为例[J].土壤,2018,50(5):975-980. YU Yunfei, YANG Shihui, YAN Hao. Inconsistency of Soil Remediation Targets Derived from Risk Assessment Model and Environmental Standards: A Case Study of a Chemical Plant in Chongqing, Southwest China[J]. Soils,2018,50(5):975-980

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-12
  • 最后修改日期:2017-08-26
  • 录用日期:2017-08-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-30
  • 出版日期: 2018-10-25
文章二维码