不同硝化抑制剂对稻季N2O排放、NH3挥发和水稻产量的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S143.1;S511

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0200104, 2016YFC0207906)


Effects of Different Nitrification Inhibitors on N2O Emission, NH3 Volatilization and Yield in Rice Season
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

The National Key Technologies R&D Program of China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了筛选出水稻生产中应用效果更佳的硝化抑制剂,在太湖地区开展水稻季田间小区试验,尿素中分别添加化学合成硝化抑制剂2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶(CP)和3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)以及生物硝化抑制剂对羟基苯丙酸甲酯(MHPP),探讨3种不同硝化抑制剂对水稻季N2O排放、NH3挥发、水稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响。结果表明,与单施尿素处理相比,尿素添加3种硝化抑制剂能显著减少N2O排放总量,抑制效果表现为DMPP(31.71%)>MHPP(30.40%)>CP(27.83%),不同硝化抑制剂间减排效果无显著差异;添加硝化抑制剂均显著增加了NH3挥发总量,促进作用表现为CP(58.7%)>DMPP(40.3%)>MHPP(25.3%),不同硝化抑制剂间差异显著;添加硝化抑制剂的增产幅度为MHPP(4.9%)>CP(3.3%)>DMPP(1.1%),不同硝化抑制剂间无显著差异;氮肥表观利用率显著增加,表现为MHPP(15.7%)>CP(13.8%)>DMPP(10.9%),但不同硝化抑制剂间无显著差异;综合考虑活性气态氮损失量和水稻产量,3种硝化抑制剂相比单施尿素均显著增加了单位产量活性气态氮排放强度,增加幅度表现为CP(50.3%)>DMPP(35.0%)> MHPP(17.8%),CP显著高于DMPP和MHPP。综合比较,生物硝化抑制剂MHPP在水稻生产中增效减排的作用优于化学合成硝化抑制剂CP和DMPP,但在生产应用中要与其他NH3挥发减排措施相结合,更好地发挥其增效减排潜力,推动农业绿色可持续发展。

    Abstract:

    In order to screen out nitrification inhibitor with better application effect in rice production, a paddy field plot experiment was conducted in Taihu Lake region. Synthetic nitrification inhibitor 2-chloro-6-(trichloro-methyl) pyridine (CP), 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP), and biological nitrification inhibitor methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate (MHPP) were added into urea, then the effects of different nitrification inhibitors (NIs) on N2O emission, NH3 volatilization, rice yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice season was investigated. The results show that compared with urea alone application, the addition of NIs decrease total N2O emission but increase total NH3 volatilization. The inhibitory effects of different NIs on total N2O emission are DMPP (31.71%)>MHPP (30.40%)>CP (27.83%), but no significant difference is found among different NIs. The promotion effects on total NH3 volatilization are CP (58.7%)>DMPP (40.3%)>MHPP (25.3%), no significant difference is found among different NIs. The rice yield and apparent N recovery efficiency are increased with NIs, effects of grain yield increase are MHPP (4.9%)>CP (3.3%)>DMPP (1.1%), and enhancement effects of nitrogen are MHPP (15.7%)>CP (13.8%)>DMPP (10.9%), no significant difference is found among different NIs. Comprehensively consider the rice yield and reactive gaseous nitrogen emission which induced by N2O and NH3, NIs increase yield-scaled reactive gaseous nitrogen emission, and CP (50.3%) is higher than DMPP (35.0%) and MHPP (17.8%). Overall, our study suggests that MHPP may be a better choice than CP and DMPP which decrease nitrogen loss and increase yield. Furthermore, NH3 volatilization reduction measures should be combined with NIs to achieve better nitrogen use efficiency and promote the green sustainable development of agriculture.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

曾科,王书伟,朱文彬,田玉华,尹斌.不同硝化抑制剂对稻季N2O排放、NH3挥发和水稻产量的影响[J].土壤,2023,55(3):503-511. ZENG Ke, WANG Shuwei, ZHU Wenbin, TIAN Yuhua, YIN Bin. Effects of Different Nitrification Inhibitors on N2O Emission, NH3 Volatilization and Yield in Rice Season[J]. Soils,2023,55(3):503-511

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-12
  • 最后修改日期:2022-08-28
  • 录用日期:2022-08-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-25
  • 出版日期: