基于1D-CNN的土壤全氮近红外光谱预测模型
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S153;S123

基金项目:

江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2019311)资助。


Near-infrared Spectral Prediction Model of Soil Total Nitrogen Based on 1D-CNN
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    于江苏无锡采集410个土壤样品测定土壤全氮含量,并在室内进行土壤样品光谱检测,用均值中心化、标准正态变换和趋势校正对光谱进行预处理,再运用偏最小二乘回归(PLS)、反向传播(BP)神经网络和一维卷积神经网络(1D-CNN)方法建立土壤全氮含量的回归预测模型。同时,每种模型在采用不同预处理方法的数据集上做十折交叉验证,记录预测模型的决定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)的平均值,对比3种预处理方法对模型精度的影响。结果表明:本研究基于土壤近红外光谱数据构建的1D-CNN模型预测土壤全氮含量结果可靠。使用原始数据与经均值中心化、标准正态变换、趋势校正预处理的数据训练得到的1D-CNN模型的R2分别为0.907、0.931、0.922、0.964,而PLS模型R2分别为0.856、0.863、0.861、0.880,BP神经网络模型的R2分别为0.874、0.907、0.901、0.911。1D-CNN模型在原始数据和经预处理的光谱数据上的表现均优于PLS和BP神经网络模型,对光谱数据进行预处理能够有效提高1D-CNN模型的性能,尤其是趋势校正对模型的提升效果最明显。因此,1D-CNN能更好地提取光谱特征并建立其与含氮量的映射关系,有效地避免过拟合,在未经过预处理的光谱数据上依然能够达到一定的精度。

    Abstract:

    A total of 410 soil samples were collected in Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, and total nitrogen contents. and soil sample spectra were analyzed indoors. The spectral data underwent preprocessing, including mean centering, standard normal variate transformation, and trend correction. Regression prediction models for soil total nitrogen content were established using partial least squares (PLS), back propagation (BP) neural networks, and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNN). Each model underwent ten-fold cross-validation using datasets preprocessed with various methods, and the average values of the coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) were recorded to compare the impact of these three preprocessing methods on model accuracy. The results demonstrated the reliability of the 1D-CNN model constructed based on soil near-infrared spectral data. The R2 values for the 1D-CNN model trained with raw data and data preprocessed with mean centering, standard normal variate transformation, and trend correction were 0.907, 0.931, 0.922, and 0.964, respectively. In comparison, the R2 values for the PLS model were 0.856, 0.863, 0.861, and 0.880, while the BP neural network model's R2 values were 0.874, 0.907, 0.901, and 0.911. The 1D-CNN model consistently outperformed the PLS and BP neural network models on both raw and preprocessed spectral data. Preprocessing the spectral data effectively enhanced the 1D-CNN model's performance, with trend correction demonstrating the most substantial improvement. Hence, 1D-CNN is adept at extracting spectral features and establishing a robust mapping relationship with nitrogen content, effectively preventing overfitting. Even with unprocessed spectral data, it still achieves a commendable level of accuracy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

秦文虎,董凯月,邓志超.基于1D-CNN的土壤全氮近红外光谱预测模型[J].土壤,2023,55(6):1347-1353. QIN Wenhu, DONG Kaiyue, DENG Zhichao. Near-infrared Spectral Prediction Model of Soil Total Nitrogen Based on 1D-CNN[J]. Soils,2023,55(6):1347-1353

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-04
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-20
  • 录用日期:2023-03-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-22
  • 出版日期: