典型黑土区农场尺度土壤属性数字制图方法对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国科学院南京土壤研究所、安徽理工大学;2.安徽理工大学空间信息与测绘工程学院;3.中国科学院南京土壤研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S159

基金项目:

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项课题(XDA28100500);国家自然科学基金(42271369);安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(2208085MD88)


A comparative study of farm-scale digital mapping methods for soil attributes in the typical black soil region
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences、School of Geomatics, Anhui University of Science and Technology;2.School of Geomatics,Anhui University of Science and Technology;3.Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

Strategic pilot science and technology project of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA28100500);National natural science foundation of China(42271369);Supported by natural science foundation of Anhui Province(2208085MD88)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土壤属性的空间分布特征对土地质量定量化监测、精准化农业生产和土地资源可持续利用具有重要意义。本研究以东北典型黑土区友谊农场核心示范区为研究区,选取土壤因子、地形因子和遥感指数等环境变量,运用普通克里格(ordinary kriging,OK)、地理加权回归(geographically weighted regression,GWR)、随机森林(random forest,RF)和随机森林-普通克里格(random forest-ordinary kriging,RF-OK)四种代表性数字土壤制图模型,对示范区表层土壤pH、土壤有机质(soil organic matter,SOM)和土壤全氮(total nitrogen,TN)进行空间预测制图,并根据模型精度选择最优模型绘制出空间分布不确定性图。结果表明:1)示范区表层土壤pH、SOM和TN含量平均值分别为6.63、42.26 g·kg-1和1.94 g·kg-1,变异系数分别为13.67%、29.50%和31.98%,均属于中等程度空间变异。2)对比四种模型精度指标,RF-OK模型对示范区pH和SOM的预测性能表现最佳(R2=0.83,CCC=0.84,RMSE=0.41和R2=0.72,CCC=0.68,RMSE=7.36 g·kg-1);RF模型对TN的预测性能最佳(R2=0.59,CCC=0.68,RMSE=0.36 g·kg-1)。3)示范区三种土壤属性的空间分布表现出较强的空间异质性,四种模型预测的土壤pH、SOM和TN空间分布的整体变化趋势基本一致,均表现出东北部高,西南部低的空间格局。本研究将不仅为示范区精准农业管理提供数据支持,也为数字土壤制图在实际应用中预测方法的选取提供有价值的参考。

    Abstract:

    The spatial distribution characteristics of soil attributes are of great significance for quantitative monitoring of land quality, precision agricultural production, and sustainable use of land resources. Therefore, to meet the needs of quantitative monitoring of the quantity and quality of China's black soil and the development of modern precision agriculture for different scales of high-precision key soil attributes, the core demonstration area of Youyi Farm was selected as the study area. A total of 152 soil samples of the surface layer (0-20 cm) were collected and 29 variables, such as soil texture, topography, and the derived factors and bio-factors, were chosen as the environmental variables. Four representative digital soil mapping models, ordinary kriging (OK), geographically weighted regression (GWR), random forest (RF) and random forest-ordinary kriging (RF-OK), were selected to predict the contents and spatial distributions of soil pH, soil organic matter (SOM), and total nitrogen (TN) contents. The root mean of square error (RMSE), consistency correlation coefficient (CCC), coefficient of determination (R2), and bias (Bias) were used to comprehensively evaluate the prediction performance of the models. The results showed that the pH value of soil samples in the study area ranged from 5.26 to 8.42 with an average value of 6.63. The SOM content ranged from 19.41 to 109.17 g·kg-1 with an average value of 42.26 g·kg-1. The TN content ranged from 0.94 to 5.20 g·kg-1 with an average value of 1.94 g·kg-1. The coefficients of variation were 13.67%, 29.50% and 31.98%, respectively, all of which belonged to moderate spatial variation. In terms of the prediction accuracy of the four models, the RF-OK model showed the best performance for predicting soil pH (R2 = 0.83 and RMSE = 0.41) and SOM (R2 = 0.72 and RMSE = 7.36 g·kg-1). The RF model achieved the best performance in predicting soil TN (R2 = 0.59 and RMSE = 0.36 g·kg-1). Based on the optimal models, the overall spatial distribution trends of soil pH, SOM and TN were similar. Soil pH in the northeast was dominated by neutral soils, whereas that in the southwest was mainly acidic soils. The SOM and TN contents in the northeast were obviously higher than those in the southwest. This study not only provides data support for precision agriculture management in the demonstration area, but also provides valuable reference for selecting prediction methods of digital soil mapping.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-06
  • 最后修改日期:2024-05-16
  • 录用日期:2024-05-17
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: