弱疏水性抗生素在生物炭改良紫色土中的吸附热力学研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川省雅安生态环境监测中心站;2.西南交通大学环境科学与工程学院

中图分类号:

X53

基金项目:

四川省自然科学基金资助项目(2024NSFSC0837),甘孜州科技计划项目(24Kjjh0007)


Thermodynamic study on the adsorption of weakly hydrophobic antibiotics in biochar-amended purple soils
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Sichuan Ya '2.'3.an ecological environment monitoring center station;4.Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University;5.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以西南地区分布最广的旱作土壤之一—石灰性紫色土为研究对象,通过批量平衡实验研究了不同原材料、热解温度的生物炭在紫色土中吸附磺胺嘧啶(SDZ)和氟苯尼考(FFC)的效用与机制.结果表明:Freundlich等温吸附模型能更好地拟合生物炭、紫色土、生物炭改良紫色土对抗生素的吸附等温线,除低温生物炭的吸附过程为非自发进行外,其余均为自发进行的物理吸附过程.油菜生物炭与水稻生物炭的吸附容量常数(KF)普遍没有显著性差异(P > 0.05);低温生物炭与高温生物炭的吸附容量常数(KF)普遍具有显著性差异(P < 0.05); SDZ(KF = 0.02 ~ 0.45)和FFC(KF = 0.09 ~ 0.40)在紫色土中吸附均较弱.将生物炭施用到紫色土后,生物炭改良紫色土对SDZ(FFC)的吸附容量常数(KF)较紫色土提高0.60 ~ 452.00倍(3.15 ~ 278.89倍),低温生物炭改良紫色土较低温生物炭提高3.95 ~ 120.00倍(2.19 ~ 9.10倍),高温生物炭改良紫色土较高温生物炭提高-0.61 ~ 26.45倍(-0.75 ~ 0.40倍),低温生物炭与紫色土对供试抗生素的吸附性能具有叠加效应,而高温生物炭在生物炭改良紫色土中并未发挥其原有的吸附性能,对磺胺嘧啶和氟苯尼考的吸附容量常数(KF)甚至出现降低的趋势,最大降幅分别可达61.00%、75.00%.

    Abstract:

    The effectiveness and mechanism of biochar adsorption of sulfadiazine (SDZ) and florfenicol (FFC) in purple soil with different raw materials and pyrolysis temperatures were investigated by batch equilibrium experiments using calcareous purple soil, one of the most widely distributed dry soils in southwest China. The results showed that the Freundlich isothermal adsorption model could better fit the adsorption isotherms of biochar, purple clay, and biochar-amended purple clay for antibiotics, and all of them were spontaneous physical adsorption processes, except for the low-temperature biochar, where the adsorption process was non-spontaneous. The sorption capacity constants (KF) of rape biochar and rice biochar were generally not significantly different (P > 0.05), and those of low-temperature biochar and high-temperature biochar were generally significantly different (P < 0.05), SDZ (KF = 0.02~0.45) and FFC (KF = 0.09~0.40) were both weakly adsorbed in the purple soil. After biochar was applied to purple soil, the adsorption capacity constant (KF) of SDZ (FFC) of biochar improved purple soil was 0.60 ~ 452.00 times (3.15 ~ 278.89 times) higher than that of purple soil, the adsorption capacity constant (KF) of low-temperature biochar improved purple soil was 3.95 ~ 120.00 times (2.19 ~ 9.10 times) higher than that of low-temperature biochar, and the adsorption capacity constant (KF) of high-temperature biochar improved purple soil was -0.61 ~ 26.45 times (- 0.75 ~ 0.40 times) higher than that of high-temperature biochar, the adsorption performance of low-temperature biochar and purple soil for the tested antibiotics had a superimposed effect, while the high-temperature biochar did not exert its original adsorption performance in the biochar-amended purple soil, and the adsorption capacity constants (KF) for sulfadiazine and florfenicol even showed a tendency to decrease, with the maximum decrease up to 61.00% and 75.00%, respectively.

    参考文献
    [1] 2020年中国兽用抗菌药使用情况报告[N]. 中国畜牧兽医报, 2021-11-14(003).
    [2] Zhang Z-B, Duan Y-P, Zhang Z-J, et al. Multimedia fate model and risk assessment of typical antibiotics in the integrated demonstration zone of the Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 805.
    [3] Ana K M S, Madriaga J, Espino M P. beta-Lactam antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in Asian lakes and rivers: An overview of contamination, sources and detection methods[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 275.
    [4] Wang J, Wang L, Zhu L, et al. Antibiotic resistance in agricultural soils: Source, fate, mechanism and attenuation strategy[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 52(6): 847-889.
    [5] Sun J, Zeng Q, Tsang D C W, et al. Antibiotics in the agricultural soils from the Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 189: 301-308.
    [6] 刘欣雨, 张建强, 黄雯, 等. 中国土壤中抗生素赋存特征与影响因素研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(04): 672-681.
    [7] Pan X, Gu Z, Chen W, et al. Preparation of biochar and biochar composites and their application in a Fenton-like process for wastewater decontamination: A review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 754.
    [8] Jiang C, Cai H, Chen L, et al. Effect of forestry-waste biochars on adsorption of Pb(II) and antibiotic florfenicol in red soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(4): 3861-3871.
    [9] Premarathna K S D, Rajapaksha A U, Adassoriya N, et al. Clay-biochar composites for sorptive removal of tetracycline antibiotic in aqueous media[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 238: 315-322.
    [10] Zeng Z-W, Tian S-R, Liu Y-G, et al. Comparative study of rice husk biochars for aqueous antibiotics removal[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2018, 93(4): 1075-1084.
    [11] Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, et al. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 125: 70-85.
    [12] Ahmad Z, Gao B, Mosa A, et al. Removal of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by biochars derived from potassium-rich biomass[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 180: 437-449.
    [13] Ahmad M, Lee S S, Dou X, et al. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 118: 536-544.
    [14] Sukul P, Lamshoeft M, Zuehlke S, et al. Sorption and desorption of sulfadiazine in soil and soil-manure systems[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(8): 1344-1350.
    [15] Singh N. Sorption behavior of triazole fungicides in Indian soils and its correlation with soil properties[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(22): 6434-6439.
    [16] Zhou D, Ghosh S, Zhang D, et al. Role of Ash Content in Biochar for Copper Immobilization[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2016, 33(12): 962-969.
    [17] Feng D, Yu H, Deng H, et al. Adsorption Characteristics of Norfloxacin by Biochar Prepared by Cassava Dreg: Kinetics, Isotherms, and Thermodynamic Analysis[J]. Bioresources, 2015, 10(4): 6751-6768.
    [18] Zhao H, Lang Y. Adsorption behaviors and mechanisms of florfenicol by magnetic functionalized biochar and reed biochar[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 88: 152-160.
    [19] 阴文敏, 关卓, 刘琛, 等. 生物炭施用及老化对紫色土中抗生素吸附特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(06): 2920-2929.
    [20] 轩盼盼, 唐翔宇, 鲜青松, 等. 生物炭对紫色土中氟喹诺酮吸附-解吸的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(06): 2222-2231.
    [21] 齐瑞环, 李兆君, 龙健, 等. 土壤粉碎粒径对土霉素在土壤中吸附的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(02): 589-595.
    [22] Wang B, Li M, Zhang H, et al. Effect of straw-derived dissolved organic matter on the adsorption of sulfamethoxazole to purple paddy soils[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 203.
    [23] Ma W, Xu X, An B, et al. Single and ternary competitive adsorption-desorption and degradation of amphenicol antibiotics in three agricultural soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 297.
    [24] Calvet R. Adsorption of organic chemicals in soils[J]. Environmental health perspectives, 1989, 83: 145-77.
    [25] Yang Z, Xing R, Zhou W. Adsorption of ciprofloxacin and Cu2+ onto biochars in the presence of dissolved organic matter derived from animal manure[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(14): 14382-14392.
    [26] Feng Z, Fan Z, Song H, et al. Biochar induced changes of soil dissolved organic matter: The release and adsorption of dissolved organic matter by biochar and soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 783.
    [27] Keiluweit M, Nico P S, Johnson M G, et al. Dynamic Molecular Structure of Plant Biomass-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar)[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 2010, 44(4): 1247-1253.
    [28] Vithanage M, Rajapaksha A U, Zhang M, et al. Acid-activated biochar increased sulfamethazine retention in soils[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(3): 2175-2186.
    [29] Aldana G O, Hazlerigg C, Lopez-Capel E, et al. Agrochemical leaching reduction in biochar-amended tropical soils of Belize[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 72(3): 1243-1255.
    [30] Hameed R, Lei C, Fang J, et al. Co-transport of biochar colloids with organic contaminants in soil column[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(2): 1574-1586.
    [31] 宋豆豆, 李莉, 刘伟婷. 玉米秸秆改性生物炭对磺胺类抗生素的吸附特性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(11): 1473-1480.
    [32] 南志江, 蒋煜峰, 毛欢欢, 等. 玉米秸秆生物炭对灰钙土吸附金霉素的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(12): 5896-5904.
    [33] Krasucka P, Pan B, Ok Y S, et al. Engineered biochar - A sustainable solution for the removal of antibiotics from water[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 405.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-30
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-23
  • 录用日期:2024-09-29
文章二维码