弱疏水性抗生素在生物炭改良紫色土中的吸附热力学研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川省雅安生态环境监测中心站;2.西南交通大学环境科学与工程学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X53

基金项目:

四川省自然科学基金资助项目(2024NSFSC0837),甘孜州科技计划项目(24Kjjh0007)


Thermodynamic study on the adsorption of weakly hydrophobic antibiotics in biochar-amended purple soils
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Sichuan Ya '2.'3.an ecological environment monitoring center station;4.Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University;5.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以西南地区分布最广的旱作土壤之一—石灰性紫色土为研究对象,通过批量平衡实验研究了不同原材料、热解温度的生物炭在紫色土中吸附磺胺嘧啶(SDZ)和氟苯尼考(FFC)的效用与机制.结果表明:Freundlich等温吸附模型能更好地拟合生物炭、紫色土、生物炭改良紫色土对抗生素的吸附等温线,除低温生物炭的吸附过程为非自发进行外,其余均为自发进行的物理吸附过程.油菜生物炭与水稻生物炭的吸附容量常数(KF)普遍没有显著性差异(P > 0.05);低温生物炭与高温生物炭的吸附容量常数(KF)普遍具有显著性差异(P < 0.05); SDZ(KF = 0.02 ~ 0.45)和FFC(KF = 0.09 ~ 0.40)在紫色土中吸附均较弱.将生物炭施用到紫色土后,生物炭改良紫色土对SDZ(FFC)的吸附容量常数(KF)较紫色土提高0.60 ~ 452.00倍(3.15 ~ 278.89倍),低温生物炭改良紫色土较低温生物炭提高3.95 ~ 120.00倍(2.19 ~ 9.10倍),高温生物炭改良紫色土较高温生物炭提高-0.61 ~ 26.45倍(-0.75 ~ 0.40倍),低温生物炭与紫色土对供试抗生素的吸附性能具有叠加效应,而高温生物炭在生物炭改良紫色土中并未发挥其原有的吸附性能,对磺胺嘧啶和氟苯尼考的吸附容量常数(KF)甚至出现降低的趋势,最大降幅分别可达61.00%、75.00%.

    Abstract:

    The effectiveness and mechanism of biochar adsorption of sulfadiazine (SDZ) and florfenicol (FFC) in purple soil with different raw materials and pyrolysis temperatures were investigated by batch equilibrium experiments using calcareous purple soil, one of the most widely distributed dry soils in southwest China. The results showed that the Freundlich isothermal adsorption model could better fit the adsorption isotherms of biochar, purple clay, and biochar-amended purple clay for antibiotics, and all of them were spontaneous physical adsorption processes, except for the low-temperature biochar, where the adsorption process was non-spontaneous. The sorption capacity constants (KF) of rape biochar and rice biochar were generally not significantly different (P > 0.05), and those of low-temperature biochar and high-temperature biochar were generally significantly different (P < 0.05), SDZ (KF = 0.02~0.45) and FFC (KF = 0.09~0.40) were both weakly adsorbed in the purple soil. After biochar was applied to purple soil, the adsorption capacity constant (KF) of SDZ (FFC) of biochar improved purple soil was 0.60 ~ 452.00 times (3.15 ~ 278.89 times) higher than that of purple soil, the adsorption capacity constant (KF) of low-temperature biochar improved purple soil was 3.95 ~ 120.00 times (2.19 ~ 9.10 times) higher than that of low-temperature biochar, and the adsorption capacity constant (KF) of high-temperature biochar improved purple soil was -0.61 ~ 26.45 times (- 0.75 ~ 0.40 times) higher than that of high-temperature biochar, the adsorption performance of low-temperature biochar and purple soil for the tested antibiotics had a superimposed effect, while the high-temperature biochar did not exert its original adsorption performance in the biochar-amended purple soil, and the adsorption capacity constants (KF) for sulfadiazine and florfenicol even showed a tendency to decrease, with the maximum decrease up to 61.00% and 75.00%, respectively.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-30
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-23
  • 录用日期:2024-09-29
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码