麦玉系统周年保护性耕作下土壤微生物多样性及其关键驱动因子
作者:
作者单位:

1.土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室/封丘农业生态实验站中国科学院南京土壤研究所;2.中国科学院大学

中图分类号:

S154.3

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划),国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Soil Microbial Diversity and Its Key Driving Factors in Wheat-Maize System under Annual Conservation Tillage
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture/State Experimental Station of Agro-Ecosystem in Fengqiu,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing ,China;2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [31]
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    保护性耕作是优化土壤结构与微生物多样性的重要举措,对耕地地力与粮食产能提升具有重大意义。本研究依托黄淮海平原潮土区的麦玉系统周年保护性耕作大田定位试验,分析连续16年试验后的土壤理化特性、微生物多样性及群落组成,结果表明:1)少免耕较连续性耕作处理显著降低了土壤通气孔隙和持水孔隙体积以及微团聚体质量比例,显著提高了土壤容重、大团聚体质量比例以及总有机碳(TOC)、活性有机碳(LOC)、全氮(TN)和碱解氮(AN)含量;相比之下,秸秆还田较秸秆移除处理显著降低了土壤容重和微团聚体质量比例,显著提高了土壤通气孔隙和持水孔隙体积、大团聚体质量比例以及TOC、LOC、TN和AN含量。 2)细菌和真菌的群落多样性及物种组成对耕作方式与秸秆管理的响应存在显著差异性,其中耕作方式显著改变了细菌的群落多样性和丰富度,而秸秆管理对细菌和真菌的群落多样性及丰富度均产生显著的影响;与常规处理(连续性耕作秸秆移除)相比,少免耕秸秆还田总体上降低了细菌Shannon和Chao1指数,却显著提高了真菌的Shannon和Chao1指数;在门水平上,少免耕和秸秆还田对细菌与真菌的群落组成均施以显著影响,在属水平上,不同处理间的物种差异主要体现在秸秆管理上。3)周年保护性耕作主要通过改变土壤化学特性(包括TOC、LOC、TN和AN)来显著影响细菌群落多样性及丰富度,而真菌群落多样性及丰富度的变化主要由土壤物理特性(包括容重、通气孔隙和持水孔隙)驱动。综上所述,麦玉系统周年保护性耕作能够通过改变潮土理化特性,不同程度地影响着微生物群落多样性,研究可为黄淮海平原土壤生物肥力培育提供理论指导与技术支撑。

    Abstract:

    Conservation tillage is an important measure to optimize soil structure and microbial diversity, which is of great importance for soil fertility and productivity. This study is based on the positioning experiment of wheat-maize annual conservation tillage in fluvo-aquic soil area of the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, soil physical and chemical properties, microbial diversity and community composition were analyzed after 16 years. The results showed that: 1) Compared with continuous tillage, reduced/no-tillage significantly reduced aeration pore and water holding poreand the mass proportion of microaggregate, and significantly increased soil bulk density, the mass proportion of macroaggregate and total organic carbon (TOC), liable organic carbon (LOC), total nitrogen (TN) and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen (AN). In contrast, compared with straw removing, straw returning significantly reduced soil bulk density and mass proportion of microaggregate, and significantly increased soil aeration pore, water holding pore, mass proportion of macroaggregate, TOC, LOC, TN and AN. 2) The responses of bacterial and fungal community diversity and composition to tillage and straw managements were significantly different. Tillage significantly changed bacterial community diversity and richness, while straw management had significant effects on both bacterial and fungal community diversity and richness. Compared with the conventional treatment (continuous tillage with straw removing), reduced/no-tillage with straw returning decreased the Shannon and Chao1 indices of bacteria in general, increased Shannon and Chao1 indices of fungi significantly. At phylum level, reduced/no-tillage and straw returning both had significant effects on the community composition of bacteria and fungi. At genus level, species differences among different treatments were mainly between straw managements. 3)Annual conservation tillage significantly affected the diversity and richness of bacterial community through changing soil chemical properties (TOC, LOC, TN and AN), while changes in fungal community diversity and richness were mainly driven by soil physical properties (bulk density, aeration pore and water holding pore). In summary, annual conservation tillage in wheat-maize system can affect the diversity of microbial community in different degrees by changing the physical and chemical characteristics of fluvo-aquic soil. This study can provide theoretical guidance and technical support for cultivating soil biological fertility in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain.

    参考文献
    [1] Cárceles Rodríguez B, Durán-Zuazo V H, et al. Conservation Agriculture as a Sustainable System for Soil Health: A Review[J]. Soil Systems, 2022, 6(4): 87
    [2] Farooq M, Nawaz A, Rehman A, et al. Conservation agriculture effects on ecosystem health and sustainability —A review of rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 957: 177535.
    [3] 王雅芝, 齐鹏, 王晓娇, 等. Meta分析中国保护性耕作对土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(2): 378-392.
    [4] Li Y, Li Z, Cui S, et al. Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: A global meta-analysis[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 194: 104292.
    [5] Li Y Z, Song D P, Liang S H, et al. Effect of no-tillage on soil bacterial and fungal community diversity: A meta-analysis[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 204: 104721.
    [6] Wang Z T, Li T, LI Y Z, et al. Relationship between the microbial community and catabolic diversity in response to conservation tillage[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 196: 104431.
    [7] 孙波, 朱安宁, 姚荣江, 沈仁芳, 张佳宝. 潮土、红壤和盐碱地障碍消减技术与产能提升模式研究进[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(5): 1231-1247.
    [8] Zhang X F, Zhu A N, Xin X X, et al. Tillage and residue management for long-term wheat-maize cropping in the North China Plain: I. Crop yield and integrated soil fertility index[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 221: 157-165.
    [9] Schj?nning P, Munkholm L J, Moldrup P, et al. Modelling soil pore characteristics from measurements of air exchange: the long-term effects of fertilization and crop rotation[J]. European, 2002, 53: 331-339.
    [10] Tisdall J M. Possible role of soil microorganisms in aggregation in soils[J]. Plant and Soil, 1994, 159: 115-121.
    [11] 刘红梅, 李睿颖, 高晶晶, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤团聚体及微生物学特性的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(6): 1277-1284.
    [12] Sadiq M, Rahim N, Tahir M M, et al. Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2024, 15: 1356426.
    [13] 王旭东, 庄俊杰, 刘冰洋, 等. 秸秆还田条件下中国农田土壤有机碳含量变化及其影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(8): 12-24.
    [14] 吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 等. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912.
    [15] 邱丽丽 李淡淡, 张佳宝, 等. 基于共现网络的关键微生物对秸秆还田土壤小麦产量的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(2): 491-502.
    [16] Hao M M, Hu H Y, Liu Z, et al. Shifts in microbial community and carbon sequestration in farmland soil under long-term conservation tillage and straw returning[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 136: 43-54.
    [17] Sadiq M, Li G, Rahim N, et al. Sustainable Conservation Tillage Technique for Improving Soil Health by Enhancing Soil Physicochemical Quality Indicators under Wheat Mono-Cropping System Conditions[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(15): 8177.
    [18] Tang S, Ma Q X, Marsden K A, et al. Microbial community succession in soil is mainly driven by carbon and nitrogen contents rather than phosphorus and sulphur contents[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 180: 109019.
    [19] Sun R B, Li W Y, Dong W X, et al. Tillage Changes Vertical Distribution of Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 699.
    [20] 张童欣, 侯岳彤, 滕岳洪, 等. 不同种类和裂解温度生物质炭添加对稻田土壤微生物多样性和群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(4): 776-787.
    [21] Zhu X C, Sun L Y, Song F B, et al. Soil microbial community and activity are affected by integrated agricultural practices in China[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 69(5): 924-935.
    [22] 王霖, 廖亦阳, 李先德, 等. 不同岩茶产区土壤碳氮磷钾生态化学计量比及其对真菌多样性的影[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(5): 1007-1017.
    [23] Li Y, Zhang Q P, Cai Y J, et al. Minimum tillage and residue retention increase soil microbial population size and diversity: Implications for conservation tillage[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 716: 137164.
    [24] Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini M T, et al. Microbial diversity and soil functions[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2003, 54(4): 655-670.
    [25] Ahn J-H, Lee S A, Kim J M, et al. Dynamics of bacterial communities in rice field soils as affected by different long-term fertilization practices[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2016, 54(11): 724-731.
    [26] Yang Y, Dou Y X, Wang B R, et al. Deciphering factors driving soil microbial life‐history strategies in restored grasslands[J]. iMeta, 2022, 2: e66.
    [27] Xu L H, Ravnskov S, Larsen J, et al. Soil fungal community structure along a soil health gradient in pea fields examined using deep amplicon sequencing[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 46: 26-32.
    [28] Hu X J, Liu J J, Liang A Z, et al. Soil metagenomics reveals reduced tillage improves soil functional profiles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in bulk and rhizosphere soils[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment, 2025, 379: 109371.
    [29] Romano I, Bodenhausen N, Basch G, et al. Impact of conservation tillage on wheat performance and its microbiome[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1211758.
    [30] Yan S S, Song J M, Fan J S, et al. Changes in soil organic carbon fractions and microbial community under rice straw return in Northeast China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 22: e00962.
    [31] Zhang S X, Mclaughlin N B, Cui S Y, et al. Effects of long-term tillage on carbon partitioning of nematode metabolism in a Black soil of Northeast China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 138: 207-212.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-21
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-27
  • 录用日期:2025-04-03
文章二维码