增温和截雨干旱对典型红壤蒸散发的影响 ①

DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.桂林理工大学;2.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所;3.安徽省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所;4.中国科学院南京土壤研究所;5.江西省红壤及种质资源研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S162

基金项目:

井冈山农高区省级科技专项“揭榜挂帅”项目(20222-051261)资助。


Effects of Rainfall Interception and Warming on Evapotranspiration in Red Soil
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Guilin University Of Technology;2.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences;3.Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences;4.Guilin University of Technology;5.Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences;6.Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil and Germplasm Resources

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究气候变化下季节性干旱加剧对我国南方红壤农田生态系统蒸散发的影响及其驱动机制,本研究选取江西省第四纪红黏土发育而来的典型红壤,利用Lysimeter大型蒸渗仪,设置对照(CK)、截雨25%(P-25%)、增温2℃(T+2℃)和截雨25%+增温2℃(P-25%+T+2℃)等4种处理,研究不同干旱模式对剖面0-150 cm土壤水分动态、蒸散量及其驱动因子的影响。结果表明:1)各干旱处理导致0~150 cm剖面土壤含水量和储水量分别下降2.5%~15%和2.52%~14.67%,其中浅层(0-40 cm)土壤水分对降雨响应敏感,而深层(100 cm和150 cm)则保持相对稳定;2)湿润期(1-6月),P-25%、T+2℃和(P-25%+T+2℃)等干旱模式在0-40 cm土层含水量变幅最为显著,较CK分别降低4.92%、3.63%和13.90%;干旱期(7-12月)规律类似但降幅进一步增大;3)日蒸散量波动范围为0~20 mm,T+2℃显著增加5.17%,而P-25%和(P-25%+T+2℃)则分别下降16.42%和14.17%,且湿润期蒸散波动幅度明显低于干旱期;4)结构方程显示,P-25%处理降低了气象因子(水分与热量)对蒸散量的贡献(13.2%和17.2%),增强了土壤含水量的直接作用(55%);T+2℃处理增强了气象因子(水分)的主导效应(37.9%),但降低了气象因子(热量)和土壤含水量的贡献度(15.4%和77.8%),(P-25%+T+2℃)处理则使热量因子的总效应下降24.2%。综上,红壤区增温和截雨降低了土壤水分状况、增大了土壤蒸发,显著加剧了季节性干旱胁迫。研究结果可为未来气候情境下南方红壤区农田水文循环与干旱防控提供理论和数据支撑。

    Abstract:

    To investigate the impact of intensified seasonal drought under climate change on evapotranspiration in red soil farmland ecosystems in southern China and its driving mechanisms, this study was conducted on typical red soils derived from Quaternary red clay in Jiangxi Province using a large scale lysimeter. Four treatments were applied: control (CK), 25% rainfall interception (P-25%), warming by +2°C(T+2°C), and their combination (P-25%+T+2°C), to assess the effects of drought regimes on soil moisture dynamics in the 0–150 cm profile, evapotranspiration, and their driving factors. All drought treatments significantly reduced soil moisture content and water storage in the 0–150 cm profile by 2.5~15% and 2.52~14.67%. Among these, the shallow (0-40 cm) layers were most sensitive to rainfall variation, whereas the deeper layers (100 cm and 150 cm) remained relatively stable. During the wet season (January to June), the water content variation in the 0-40 cm soil layers was most significant under the treatments of P-25%, T+2°C and (P-25%+T+2°C) with reductions of 4.92%, 3.63% and 13.90%, respectively, compared to the control (CK). Meanwhile, the (P-25%+T+2℃) treatment showed the greatest variation in soil moisture content across all soil layers. In the dry season (July–December), similar patterns were observed but with greater decreases. Daily evapotranspiration ranged from 0 to 20 mm. Compared with CK, T+2°C increased evapotranspiration by 5.17%, whereas P-25% and P-25% + T+2°C reduced it by 16.42% and 14.17%, respectively. Evapotranspiration fluctuations were significantly smaller during the wet season than in the dry season. Structural equation modelling revealed that P-25% reduced the contributions of meteorological factors (moisture and heat) to evapotranspiration (by 13.2% and 17.2%, respectively), while enhancing the direct effect of soil moisture (55%). In contrast, T+2°C strengthened the dominant role of meteorological moisture (37.9%), but diminished the influence of meteorological heat and soil moisture (15.4% and 77.8%). The combinedP-25%+T+2°C treatment reduced the total effect of the heat factor by 24.2%. In summary, Warming and rainfall interception in red soil regions have reduced soil water deficits and intensify soil evaporation, thereby amplifying seasonal drought stress. These findings provide valuable theoretical and empirical evidence for improving agricultural water cycling and drought mitigation strategies in southern China’s red soil regions under future climate change scenarios.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-25
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-17
  • 录用日期:2025-11-21
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码