我国城市固体垃圾填埋场渗滤液PFAS赋存特征及生态风险评估
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国地质大学(武汉)环境学院、中国科学院南京土壤研究所;2.中国科学院南京土壤研究所;3.火箭军工程大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X

基金项目:


Occurrence Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of PFAS in Leachate from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills in China
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Environmental Studies,China University of Geosciences Wuhan、Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences;2.Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences;3.Rocket Force University of Engineering,Xi’an

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    垃圾填埋场是全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)向环境释放的重要“二次源”。本研究通过系统检索2000-2025年文献,构建了覆盖中国15个省份、56个垃圾填埋场及周边不同环境介质中PFAS单体均值浓度数据库,共获取1569条数据。基于统计中位值浓度,结果表明:(1)渗滤液中检出66种单体,总浓度为3.05×103~1.58×105 ng/L,其中短链替代物PFPrA(9350 ng/L)、5:3 FTCA(2880 ng/L)、PFBS(2025 ng/L)已超过传统PFOA(405.30 ng/L)和PFOS(109.05 ng/L),东部沿海地区PFBS浓度显著高于中西部;(2)周边环境中,土壤、地表水和地下水均以PFOA浓度最高(8.38 ng/g、77.99 ng/L、19.21 ng/L),地下水中另检出多种前体物与新型替代品;空气中挥发性前体物6:2 FTOH(1300 pg/m3)比离子型PFAS高2-4个数量级;(3)生态风险评估显示,渗滤液中PFOS(RQ=0.84~1523.5)和PFOA(RQ=0.26~145.1)呈中-高风险,而周边地表水和地下水中PFAS的RQ值均小于1,风险相对较低。研究可为填埋场PFAS污染管控提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    Landfills are important “secondary sources” of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) release to the environment. This study systematically reviewed the literature published between 2000 and 2025 and compiled a database of mean PFAS concentrations in landfills and surrounding environmental media across 15 provinces China, covering 56 landfill sites and yielding 1569 data entries. Based on statistical median concentrations, the results showed that: (1) 66 PFAS congeners were detected in leachate with total concentrations ranging from 3.05×103 to 1.58×10? ng/L. Short-chain alternatives including PFPrA (9350 ng/L), 5:3 FTCA (2880 ng/L), and PFBS (2025 ng/L) exceeded the traditional PFOA (405.30 ng/L) and PFOS (109.05 ng/L). PFBS concentrations in eastern coastal regions were significantly higher than those in central and western areas. (2) In surrounding environments, PFOA showed the highest concentrations in soil, surface water, and groundwater (8.38 ng/g, 77.99 ng/L, and 19.21 ng/L, respectively). Multiple precursors and novel alternatives were additionally detected in groundwater. The volatile precursor 6:2 FTOH (1300 pg/m3) in air was 2-4 orders of magnitude higher than ionic PFAS. (3) Ecological risk assessment indicated that PFOS (RQ=0.84-1523.5) and PFOA (RQ=0.26-145.1) in leachate posed medium to high risks, while PFAS in surrounding surface water and groundwater showed relatively low risks with RQ values below 1. This study provides scientific basis for PFAS pollution monitoring and control at landfills.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-26
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-20
  • 录用日期:2026-04-21
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码