碳富集策略对烤烟生态系统碳收支的影响研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.云南农业大学;2.江苏中烟工业有限公司;3.云南省烟草公司楚雄州公司;4.滇西应用技术大学普洱茶学院;5.中国科学院南京土壤研究所;6.云南农业大学烟草学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

.

基金项目:


Effects of Carbon Enrichment Strategies on the Carbon Budget of Flue-Cured Tobacco Ecosystem
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Yunnan Agricultural University;2.China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co.,Ltd;3.Chuxiong Branch of Yunnan Provincial Tobacco Company;4.College of Pu-erh Tea, West Yunnan University of Applied Sciences;5.Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences;6.College of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在全球气候变化与国家“双碳”战略背景下,评估并提升农田生态系统的固碳减排能力至关重要。烤烟作为我国重要的经济作物,其生态系统碳收支研究尚缺乏针对新型碳富集材料及乡级尺度精细化核算的系统工作。本研究以云南省楚雄州禄丰市中村乡为典型区域,通过农户问卷调查与田间定位试验,基于烤烟生态系统田间阶段碳核算模型,设置仅施烟草专用肥对照(CK)、烟草专用肥+硅酸钙+生物有机肥(T1)、烟草专用肥+硅酸钙+生物炭(T2)和烟草专用肥+硅酸钙+生物炭+生物有机肥(T3)4个处理,定量评估了介孔硅酸钙、生物炭及生物有机肥施用对系统碳收支的影响。结果显示,CK处理下烤烟生态系统表现为净碳源,净碳平衡为-0.75 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1。施用碳富集材料后,不同处理的系统碳收支响应存在明显差异,其中T1处理虽增加了采后残留物碳输入和土壤固碳量,但仍表现为净碳源,净碳平衡为-0.87 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1,T2和T3处理则分别形成0.38和1.21 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1的净碳汇。T3处理土壤固碳量最高,达9.14 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1,系统净碳平衡较CK提高1.96 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1,碳生态效率达到1.14,表现出较高的单位排放碳汇收益。综上所述,含生物炭的碳富集处理能够改善烤烟生态系统田间阶段净碳平衡,其中硅酸钙、生物炭和生物有机肥配施处理效果较好,可为烟田固碳减排管理提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Against the background of global climate change and China’s “dual carbon” strategy, assessing and enhancing the carbon sequestration and emission reduction capacity of farmland ecosystems is of great importance. As an important economic crop in China, flue-cured tobacco still lacks systematic studies on ecosystem carbon budgets involving novel carbon-enrichment materials and fine-scale accounting at the township level. In this study, Zhongcun Township, Lufeng City, Chuxiong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, was selected as a representative area. Based on farmer questionnaire surveys and a field positioning experiment, a field-stage carbon accounting model for the flue-cured tobacco ecosystem was established. Four treatments were set up: conventional tobacco-specific fertilizer only as the control (CK), tobacco-specific fertilizer combined with calcium silicate and bio-organic fertilizer (T1), tobacco-specific fertilizer combined with calcium silicate and biochar (T2), and tobacco-specific fertilizer combined with calcium silicate, biochar, and bio-organic fertilizer (T3). The effects of mesoporous calcium silicate, biochar, and bio-organic fertilizer application on the system carbon budget were quantitatively evaluated. The results showed that the flue-cured tobacco ecosystem under CK acted as a net carbon source, with a net carbon balance of -0.75 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1. After the application of carbon-enrichment materials, the system carbon budget responses differed markedly among treatments. Although T1 increased post-harvest residue carbon input and soil carbon sequestration, it still acted as a net carbon source, with a net carbon balance of -0.87 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1. In contrast, T2 and T3 formed net carbon sinks of 0.38 and 1.21 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1, respectively. T3 showed the highest soil carbon sequestration, reaching 9.14 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1, and increased the net carbon balance by 1.96 tCO2·hm-2·yr-1 compared with CK. Its carbon ecological efficiency reached 1.14, indicating a relatively high carbon sink return per unit carbon emission. Overall, biochar-containing carbon-enrichment treatments improved the field-stage net carbon balance of the flue-cured tobacco ecosystem. Among them, the combined application of calcium silicate, biochar, and bio-organic fertilizer showed a better overall effect, providing a reference for carbon sequestration and emission reduction management in tobacco fields.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-27
  • 最后修改日期:2026-05-21
  • 录用日期:2026-05-22
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码