设为首页  |   加入收藏
牛善栋,吕 晓.基于文献计量的中国耕地保护补偿研究进展分析[J].土壤,2018,50(1):195-201. NIU Shandong,LV Xiao.Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress on Compensation for Cultivated Land Protection in China[J].Soils,2018,50(1):195-201 本文二维码信息
二维码(扫一下试试看!)
基于文献计量的中国耕地保护补偿研究进展分析
Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress on Compensation for Cultivated Land Protection in China
投稿时间:2017-05-16  修订日期:2017-06-24
DOI:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2018.01.026
中文关键词:  耕地保护补偿  基本农田保护  补偿机制  文献计量
Key Words:Compensation for cultivated land protection  Capital farmland protection  Compensation mechanism  Bibliometric analysis
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41671176)资助。
作者单位E-mail
牛善栋 曲阜师范大学地理与旅游学院 nsd1024@foxmail.com 
吕 晓 曲阜师范大学地理与旅游学院 lvxiao1030@163.com. 
摘要点击次数: 187
全文下载次数: 218
中文摘要:
      健全耕地保护补偿机制是当前深化农村改革的重要内容之一。总结归纳中国耕地保护补偿研究文献的主要研究内容、特点与研究趋势,为后续研究提供清晰的方向和思路,对推动中国耕地保护补偿机制研究的系统和深化具有重要意义。基于1985—2016年中国知识资源总库(CNKI)收录的有关耕地保护补偿研究的中文文献,运用文献资料法、网络检索法和对比分析法,对中国耕地保护补偿研究的主要特征及问题进行量化分析。结果表明:耕地保护补偿相关文献数量呈逐渐增加的趋势,研究领域的核心作者群体已初步形成,但核心期刊载文量不多,学术水平总体上还有待进一步提高;耕地保护补偿研究仍处于理论分析和方法初探阶段,以定性研究为主,定量研究不足,还未形成完善的理论体系;实证研究空间分布不均衡,研究尺度与空间范围分布不协调;补偿标准的研究方法和模型构建还未形成一致意见。最后对需要进一步研究的重点方向与内容进行了展望。
Abstract:
      It is one of the important contents of deepening the rural reform to improve the compensation mechanism for cultivated land and basic farmland protection. This paper, based on the relevant papers published on the compensation for cultivated land protection in CNKI database from 1985 to 2016, used the methods of documentation, network retrieval and comparison to summarize the basic features, main contents, characteristics and trends on Chinese cultivated land protection and compensation mechanism in order to promote further the systematic and in-depth research. The results showed that the quantity of literature showed an increasing trend, and the core author group had initially formed, but the number of core journals was still few, and academic level needed to be further promoted. The research on compensation for cultivated land protection was still in the stage of theory analysis and method of study. The qualitative research-based method was still mainly used while the quantitative method is insufficient, and the perfect theoretical system of research was still in the forming process. The spatial distribution of empirical study, the research scale and regional distribution were uneven and discordant. No consensus was reached in the research method and model establishment on compensation standard. For the direction and contents in the further research, more attentions were needed on the theory applicability of the different methods in different units as well as on the practicability and verification of study results.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

您是第1256492位访问者
版权所有 © 《土壤》编辑部
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计   京ICP备09084417号
手机扫一扫看