《中国标准土壤色卡》与日本《新版标准土色贴》颜色准确性的比较
作者:
作者单位:

四川农业大学资源学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S152.2+4

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41671218)和国家科技基础性工作专项项目(2014FY110200A12)资助。


Comparison of Color Accuracy Between Chinese Standard Soil Color Charts and Japanese New Standard Soil Color Book
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University,

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文旨在确定《中国标准土壤色卡》(1989)和日本《新版标准土色贴》(2014)两种色卡书的颜色标注是否准确、二者之间是否存在显著的差异,以及确定能否也用后者来确定中国土壤颜色。首先用日本柯尼卡美能达CM-600d型分光测色计测定两种色卡书所有色片的Munsell色调(H)、明度(V)和彩度(C)值,再利用均方误差(MSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)等统计参数,借助土壤颜色差异等级标准 (微弱、明显、突出),评估色片测量值与标注值的差异,并用广义线性混合模型(GLMMs)检查测量变化的来源。结果表明:标注值与测量值的MSE和RMSE在H值方面表现为日本《新版标准土色贴》略高于《中国标准土壤色卡》,而在V值和C值方面表现为日本《新版标准土色贴》比《中国标准土壤色卡》分别低了71.43%、63.49% 和47.17%、39.24%。对于两种色卡书中常用的、有同样色调的色片,日本《新版标准土色贴》的290个色片中有6个(占2.07%)有“明显”差异,而《中国标准土壤色卡》的289个色片中有27个(达9.34%)有“明显”差异,但二者均无“突出”差异的色片。GLMMs统计模型显示两种色卡书之间存在显著性差异(P<0.000 1)。日本《新版标准土色贴》在V和C上较《中国标准土壤色卡》有更准确的颜色表示,但《中国标准土壤色卡》有更丰富的色片且具有中国特色,更适于我国土壤颜色的鉴定。

    Abstract:

    The purposes of this paper are comparing the accuracies and differences between Chinese Standard Soil Color Charts (1989, abbreviated as Chinese Charts) and Japanese New Standard Soil Color Book (2014, abbreviated as Japanese Charts), and determining whether the latter can also be used to determine the color of Chinese soil. Firstly, the Munsell hues (H), value (V) and chroma (C) values of all the color chips of the two color charts were measured with the Japanese Konica Minolta CM-600d spectrophotometer, then the differences between the measured and the stated values were evaluated by using statistical parameters such as mean square error (MSE) and root mean square error (RMSE) with the help of a soil color difference grade standard (faint, distinct, prominent), and finally the sources of the measurement variation were examined by the generalized linear mixed model (GLMMs). The results showed that MSE and RMSE of the stated and measured values are shown in H as Japanese Charts slightly higher than Chinese Charts. In terms of V and C, Japanese Charts is far below Chinese Charts, which are 71.43%, 63.49% and 47.17% and 39.24%, respectively. For those color chips which are commonly used and have the same color hues in the two charts, 6 (only 2.07%) of the 290 color chips in Japanese Charts have distinct differences, while 27 (9.34%) of the 289 color chips in Chinese Charts have distinct differences, but there are no prominent differences between the two charts. The GLMMs statistical model showed a significant difference between the two charts (P< 0.000 1). Japanese Charts is more accurate in V and C than Chinese Charts, however, Chinese Charts has more colorful chips with Chinese characteristics and is more suitable for the identification need of Chinese soil color.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

晏昭敏,袁大刚,陈剑科,吕 扬,翁 倩,付宏阳,王昌全.《中国标准土壤色卡》与日本《新版标准土色贴》颜色准确性的比较[J].土壤,2019,51(5):1042-1048. YAN Zhaomin, YUAN Dagang, CHEN Jianke, Lü Yang, WENG Qian, FU Hongyang, WANG Changquan. Comparison of Color Accuracy Between Chinese Standard Soil Color Charts and Japanese New Standard Soil Color Book[J]. Soils,2019,51(5):1042-1048

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-16
  • 最后修改日期:2018-03-06
  • 录用日期:2018-03-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-08-19
  • 出版日期: 2019-10-25