黑土、潮土和红壤可溶性有机质的光谱特征及结构差异
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S153.6+2

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0500202)和国家自然科学基金面上项目(4157317)资助。


Spectral Characteristics and Structural Differences of DOM in Black Soil, Fluvo-Aquic Soil and Red Soil
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究不同类型土壤可溶性有机质(DOM)含量和结构的差异性,选取黑土、潮土和红壤3种土壤的表层土壤(0~20 cm)为研究对象,提取其中的DOM,应用紫外-可见光谱、荧光光谱等技术,分析土壤中DOM的数量和光谱特征。结果显示:3种不同类型土壤中可溶性有机碳(DOC)含量及其与土壤有机碳(SOC)的比值(SOC/DOC)大小为:红壤>黑土>潮土(P<0.05);A254值大小为黑土>潮土>红壤,但SUVA254值大小为:潮土>黑土>红壤(P<0.05),表明潮土DOM的芳香化程度最高,但芳香性结构物质含量低于黑土DOM,红壤DOM的芳香性结构物质含量和芳香性构化程度均低于黑土和潮土DOM;荧光发射光谱腐殖化指数(HIXem)和荧光效率(Feff)值大小为:红壤>黑土>潮土(P<0.05),说明红壤DOM的腐殖化程度和π电子共轭基团含量比潮土和黑土DOM高;荧光指数(FI)大小为:红壤>潮土>黑土(P<0.05),表明红壤DOM比潮土和黑土DOM含有更多的微生物源组分;荧光同步光谱显示,黑土和潮土DOM以类蛋白质基团为主,红壤DOM以木质素类基团为主;在土壤有机质含量、黏粒含量和黏土矿物种类不同的情况下,土壤对DOM的吸附能力不同,使土壤DOM的提取比例也存在显著差异。

    Abstract:

    To explore the spectral characteristics and structural differences of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in different types of soil, DOM were extracted from the topsoils (0-20 cm) of black soil, fluvo-aquic soil and red soil, and then DOM spectral characteristics were analyzed by UV-visible and fluorescence spectra. The results showed that dissolved organie carbon (DOC) content and its ratio with Soil organic carbon (SOC/DOC) were in order of red soil > black soil > fluvo-aquic soil (P<0.05), A254 value was in order of black soil > fluvo-aquic soil > red soil, while SUVA254 value was in order of fluvo-aquic soil > black soil > red soil (P<0.05), suggesting that DOM of fluvo-aquic soil had the highest aromatization degree but lower aromatic content than those of black soil, while DOM of red soil had the lowest aromatic content and aromatization degree. The fluorescence emissio n spectral humification index (HIXem) and fluorescence efficiency (Feff) were in order of red soil > black soil > fluvo-aquic soil (P<0.05), demonstrating that DOM humification degree and π-electron conjugate group contents were higher in red soil than those of fluvo-aquic soil and black soil. The fluorescence index (FI) was in order of red soil > fluvo-aquic soil>black soil (P<0.05), showing that DOM of red soil contained more microbial components than those of fluvo-aquic soil and black soil. Fluorescence synchronous spectra showed that DOM of fluvo-aquic soil and black soil mainly contained protein-like groups and DOM of red soil mainly contained lignin-like groups. The extraction ratios of DOM were significantly differenced among the three kinds of soils due to their different potential DOM adsorption capacities which were derived from the differences in the contents of SOM and clays and clay mineral types.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

缪闯和,吕贻忠.黑土、潮土和红壤可溶性有机质的光谱特征及结构差异[J].土壤,2021,53(1):168-172. MIAO Chuanghe, Lü Yizhong. Spectral Characteristics and Structural Differences of DOM in Black Soil, Fluvo-Aquic Soil and Red Soil[J]. Soils,2021,53(1):168-172

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-09
  • 最后修改日期:2020-01-12
  • 录用日期:2020-01-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-01
  • 出版日期: