秸秆还田方式对土壤质量和萝卜产量及品质的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S-3

基金项目:

浙江省重点研发计划项目(2021C03025)、浙江省“三农九方”科技协作计划项目(2022SNJF024)和浙江省废弃生物质循环利用与生态处理技术重点实验室开放基金项目(2021REWB01)资助。


Effects of Straw Return on Soil Properties, Yield and Quality of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.)
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2021C03025), Zhejiang Sannong Jiufang Science and Technology Cooperation Project(2022SNJF024),Key Laboratory of Recycling and Eco-treatment of Waste Biomass Open Fund Project of Zhejiang Province (2021REWB01)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文以萝卜(品种为枇杷叶)为研究对象,采用田间试验探究了无秸秆还田(CK),秸秆粉碎还田(SC)、过腹还田(SM)、炭化还田(SB)、粉碎+过腹还田(SC+SM)、粉碎+炭化还田(SC+SB)、过腹+炭化还田(SM+SB)对土壤理化性质和萝卜产量及品质的影响。结果表明,6种秸秆还田方式均显著提高了土壤有机质和全氮含量,但对土壤速效钾含量的影响不同,其中SC、SM和SB 3种还田方式不影响土壤速效钾含量,而SC+SM、SC+SB和SM+SB 3种秸秆组合还田方式显著提高了土壤速效钾含量;不同秸秆还田方式对萝卜生物量和叶片叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)的影响不同,除SC+SM处理萝卜肉质根鲜物质量、叶片SPAD值显著低于对照外,其他秸秆还田处理萝卜肉质根鲜物重量和叶片SPAD值均显著高于对照;秸秆还田处理萝卜品质较对照显著提升,6种秸秆还田处理萝卜维生素C、可溶性糖、总酚、类黄酮含量均显著高于对照,且不同还田方式间无差异;秸秆还田还显著降低了萝卜硝酸盐含量,提高了可溶性蛋白含量,其中SC+SM、SC+SB和SM+SB 3种秸秆组合还田处理表现突出,硝酸盐含量降低36.04%~40.63%,可溶性蛋白含量提升41.70%~56.11%; SC、SM和SB处理次之,硝酸盐含量降低15.15%~22.58%,可溶性蛋白含量提升16.61%~25.11%; 6种秸秆还田方式下萝卜铁离子还原能力(FRAP)显著高于对照,但1,1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼自由基清除能力(DPPH)不同,其中SM、SC+SM、SC+SB和SM+SB处理萝卜DPPH值显著高于对照,SC和SB处理萝卜DPPH值与对照接近。综上所述,除SC+SM处理降低了萝卜产量外,SC、SM、SB、SC+SB、SM+SB等5个秸秆还田处理均提高了土壤肥力和作物产量、改善了产品品质,其中SC+SB、SM+SB在降低萝卜硝酸盐含量方面表现尤为突出。考虑到操作的难易程度,常规蔬菜生产中建议采用秸秆粉碎还田、过腹还田、炭化还田3种方式,种植根菜、叶菜等硝酸盐高积累型蔬菜时建议采用粉碎+炭化还田、过腹+炭化还田2种秸秆组合还田模式。

    Abstract:

    The effects of different straw return treatments, including no straw (CK), straw crushed (SC), straw manure (SM), straw biochar (SB), straw crushed+straw manure (SC+SM), straw crushed+straw biochar (SC+SB), and straw manure+straw biochar (SM+SB) on soil properties, yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) were studied by field experiments. The results showed that all straw return treatments significantly increased the contents of soil organic matter and total nitrogen, but had different effects on the content of soil available potassium, among them, SC+SM, SC+SB and SM+SB significantly increased the content of soil available potassium while SC, SM and SB had no affects. Straw return had different effects on biomass and SPAD value of radish, which were significantly lower under SC+SM while significantly higher under other straw return treatments than CK. The quality of radish after straw return was significantly improved compared with CK, the contents of vitamin C, soluble sugar, total phenol and flavonoid of radish treated with straw return were significantly higher than CK, and there was no difference among the straw return treatments. Straw return significantly reduced nitrate content and increased soluble protein content of radish, among them, the effects of SC+SM, SC+SB and SM+SB were more prominent, with nitrate content reduced by 36.04%-40.63% while soluble protein content increased by 41.70%-56.11%; followed by SC, SM and SB, nitrate content decreased by 15.15%-22.58% while soluble protein content increased by 16.61%-25.11%. Radish FRAP values of straw return were significantly higher than CK, but DPPH values were different, among them, DPPH values of radish were significantly higher under SM, SC+SM, SC+SB and SM+SB than CK, while DPPH values of radish in SC and SB were close to CK. SC, SM, SB, SC+SB and SM+SB all improved soil fertility, crop yield and product quality, among them, SC+SB and SM+SB were better in reducing radish nitrate content. In conclusion, SC, SM and SB were recommended for conventional vegetable production, while SC+SB and SM+SB recommended for vegetables with high nitrate accumulation, such as leafy vegetables.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘晓霞,杨东.秸秆还田方式对土壤质量和萝卜产量及品质的影响[J].土壤,2023,55(4):771-778. LIU Xiaoxia, YANG Dong. Effects of Straw Return on Soil Properties, Yield and Quality of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.)[J]. Soils,2023,55(4):771-778

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-19
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-28
  • 录用日期:2023-01-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-25
  • 出版日期: