耕作方式和秸秆还田对麦-豆轮作田土壤理化特性和土壤酶活性的影响[1]
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

河南科技大学农学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S152

基金项目:

河南省科技攻关(222102110087);河南省旱地绿色智慧农业特色骨干学科群建设项目(17100001);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0300700)


Effects of tillage methods and straw return on soil physical and chemical properties and enzyme activities in wheat-soybean rotation filed
Author:
Affiliation:

Henan University of Scienceand Technology

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为明确耕作方式与秸秆还田对麦-豆轮作田土壤理化性质和酶活性的影响,于2018~2019年度小麦成熟期利用始于2009年9月的定位试验,研究翻耕秸秆不还田(PTNR)、翻耕秸秆还田(PTSR)、旋耕秸秆不还田(RTNR)和旋耕秸秆还田(RTSR)对麦-豆轮作田土壤容重、养分含量和酶活性的影响。结果表明,与翻耕相比,旋耕有增加15~30 cm土层、降低35~60 cm土层土壤容重的趋势,且使0~5 cm、5~15 cm土层土壤有机质和全氮含量分别显著降低20.5%和21.2%、15.2%和9.7%。与秸秆不还田相比,秸秆还田使翻耕下0~5 cm、5~15 cm土层土壤容重分别显著降低2.9%、2.8%,旋耕下分别降低3.6%、2.9%,但多数条件下可显著提高0~15 cm土层有机质、全氮、有效磷、速效钾含量和脲酶、蛋白酶、转化酶、碱性磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性,且旋耕下的增幅多大于翻耕,但翻耕下15~35 cm土层上述指标的增幅多大于旋耕。从互作效应看,RTSR有利于提高表层(0~15 cm)土壤养分含量和酶活性,而PTSR利于提高15~35 cm土层土壤养分含量和酶活性以及35~60 cm土层的全氮含量。综上,秸秆还田有利于优化土壤容重、养分含量和酶活性,但其效应因耕作方式而异,PT和RT分别在0~15 cm和15~35 cm土层表现出较优的效应,进而使RTSR利于表层、PTSR利于较深土层土壤质量的提升,说明旱作区麦-豆轮作田应采用翻旋配合且秸秆还田的耕作模式。

    Abstract:

    In order to clarify the effects of tillage methods and straw return on soil physical and chemical properties and enzyme activities in wheat-soybean rotation, the effects of plowing tillage without straw return (PTNR), plowing tillage with straw return (PTSR), rotary tillage without straw return (RTNR) and rotary tillage with straw return (RTSR) on soil bulk density, nutrient content and enzyme activity at maturity of wheat in 2018~2019. The study was conducted based on a long-term located experiment which initiated from September 2009. Compared with plowing tillage (PT), rotary tillage (RT) had a tendency to increase soil bulk density in the 15~30 cm soil layer and decreased in the 35~60 cm soil layer. Compared with PT, RT significantly reduced soil organic matter and total nitrogen content by 20.5 % and 21.2 %, respectively, in the 0~5 cm soil layer, as well as by 15.2 % and 9.7 % in the 5~15 cm soil layer. Compared with no straw return (NR), straw return (SR) significantly reduced the soil bulk density in the 0~5 cm and 5~15 cm soil layers by 2.9 % and 2.8 % respectively under PT, as well as 3.6 % and 2.9 % under RT, while significantly increased the contents of organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium and the activities of urease, protease, invertase, alkaline phosphatase and catalase in the 0~15 cm soil layer under most conditions. Moreover, the increase under RT was greater than that under PT. However, the increase of the above soil indexes in the 15~35 cm soil layer under PT was greater than that under RT. Considering the interaction effects, RTSR was beneficial to increase soil nutrient content and enzyme activity in the surface layer (0~15 cm), while PTSR was beneficial to increase that in the 15~35 cm soil layer and the total nitrogen content in the 35~60 cm soil layer. In summary, straw return was beneficial to optimize soil bulk density, nutrient content and enzyme activity, but the effects varied with tillage methods. Plowing tillage and rotary tillage showed the better effects in 0~15 cm and 15~35 cm soil layers, respectively, which in turn made RTSR was beneficial to the improvement of soil quality in the surface layer and PTSR was beneficial to in the deeper soil layers. Therefore, the tillage mode of rotated plowing/rotary and straw return should be adopted in wheat-soybean rotation fields in dry farming areas.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-05
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-19
  • 录用日期:2024-04-26
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: